Post from FB: Brooke Jackson

The following is a post i did on FB that i liked and i thought i would put it on here too, just so i have it in my blogger records and in case i have any readers that are not on my facebook. since i wrote this post, i also reported brooke jackson to FB and she was immidiately removed.



"CONSENSUAL SEX IS SATISFYING SEX"

Search for Brooke Jackson (Ottawa, ON network). Her pic is of a photoshopped lusty lady holding her tits into her corset (cause she's a practical modern woman like that). I dont think this is a real profile. My detective skills say if you have no friends and post the following on a network wall, you're prolly a fake.


Brooke Jackson wrote
at 12:40am.
Get the real satisfaction that comes from consensual sex. Hookup with someone right now, visit
http://www.SearchSexTonight.com for everything that you are looking for.


Any ways, the real funny part is the "
Get the real satisfaction that comes from consensual sex." lol As if they are advertising to rapists.

"No worries, now you can have legal sex: how satisfying. ahhhh"



Comments from FB:

at 5:33pm on January 23rd, 2008
her velociraptor-like jaws intimidate me

at 6:09pm on January 23rd, 2008
I never give my hand a chance to give consent... does that make me a bad man?

at 6:21pm on January 23rd, 2008
i dont know if you are a bad man or not, but it's obvious you and your hand just arn't having the satisfying sex, only consensual sex offers.

at 7:15pm on January 23rd, 2008
I think that means that if you learn sign language, your hand can consent, and then the sex will be better. I guess sock-pupeteers have really satisfying wank sessions.

at 9:12pm on January 23rd, 2008
Since the sock pupet doesn't actually talk; rather, it has words forced upon it; the sock pupeteer is just violating the puput and entering into the unsatifying realm of clothiality (come beastiality but with clothing).

I hope to live in a world free of human on clothing violence.

at 9:18pm on January 23rd, 2008
The breadth and muscular definition of "her" shoulders and lack of actual boobular tissue in that corset, combined with the heavily photoshopped skin tecture, make me uneasy. There's something up with those eyes too. That's gotta be a dude we're looking at.

at 9:30pm on January 23rd, 2008
she does have a dudesk quality about her.

at 11:42pm on January 23rd, 2008
The lips look as though they are radioactive, and currently illuminated by a blacklight or something equally unnatural. This may lead to further questions, such as whether persons having suffered through the Chernobyl incident, or robots forged by maddened and unscrupulous soviet scientists during said period, are legally able to give informed consent for satisfying legal sex. If so, this bodes well for a continuing increase in tourism to the site and its environs.

at 11:59pm on January 23rd, 2008
The question arises, Steve: Are our squirrel cozies as satisfying as they could be? And how can we improve them?

Adam: "Brooke Jackson" eh? Ahhhhh... us.

Diet of the Year 2008

I cringe to find I live in a society that gets excited about the diet of the year 2008 as seen on Oprah, CNN etc. or the fact that such a thing would even exist.

Pretty Perposterous Prating or Payment Protection Plan

I haven't read all the details of the PPP because one has to subscribe b4 they even let you have the details. They offer that you can cancel within 30 days (of you agreeing) without any cost to you, but the one time i took this offer from MBNA, there were only ten days left by the time i got the details in the mail.



My visa expired, so they sent me a new one, with a little pamphlet about the PPP. And when a called they offered me the PPP again saying "the only time that we will actively offer you the product, is when you call". you know what that means? every fucking single time i call them, they will do a shpeal on PPP. Moreover, stamping and mailing an envelope is not 'active offering'.

They have this marvelous script to keep you on the phone. Examples include:

"It takes a minute for your card to renew, while we wait, may i offer you..." (lies)
I let the chick, Amanda, complete her script on PPP and said "no thank you, i'm not interested" her uncanny reply "as part of our customer improvement plan, can you tell me why you don't want this great offer?" "i say because i dont need it" this prompts one of 7 rebuttals that you can think of for any reason why you wouldn't want a PPP. i find saying "i had it once and dont want it," will shut them up because there is no script on their blue screen for that.

but really, what i should have said is that ppl are only covered under that PPP if they work a minimum of 25 hours (with that particular company that lays them off). if they work that many ours, but totaled over two jobs, or if they work seasonal, or on contract, or have a status of part-time or casual worker with employment or a homemaker or a student or retired or on disability or welfare etc they are not covered under the PPP at any time.

what i should have said is that according to stat can's 2006 census, 13 206 200 ppl are working full time, while the total population is 31 612 895, meaning only 41.8% of the population could even qualify for the gracious cap of $10 000.00 payment onto their Visa if they were "unemployed involuntarily or due to labour disputes, strikes or lockouts for 30 days" or "totally disabled" or had a critical illness like a "heart attack" (these events/medical conditions are said to be defined in the detailed info they will only give you once you've already agreed to have the product).

It is clear that PPP offers are not morally offered to only those that can benefit from the 'peace of mind', but even if that so only those of the 41.8% would really benefit if they carried a balance.

To even be out of work due to strike would have to mean you are a part of a union. for them to pay your visa you must be "totally disabled" or dying. if you are dying, do you REALLY think that you will give a shit about your credit? That you will care if your credit goes down a point because you couldn't pay your min balance once or twice? Most ppl miss their payments just because they have a messy desk. That is WAY more likely to happen, but no one offers us that kind of peace of mind.

Speaking of offering products, psychologically, humans are more inclined to donate money or accept these products when death is made salient. That's why their shpeal will mention things like critical illness like "Cancer (Life-Threatening)". Notice they are in caps. When a lady is talking to you some times they through in qualifiers like, "Heaven forbid".


Really, the only peace of mind is to keep a savings of three months salary in an account at all times, be sure not to keep balances unnecessary debt products (like all the shit we like to put on our Visa) and what ever you do, don't pay a dollar for every 100 you keep on your credit card, put that in your account instead and keep it for all the peace of minds that are not included in the PPP.

EG. Credit Balance= 10 000.00
Interest for 31 days at 19.5% annum: 165.62
PPP: 100.00
if they include your interest as the balance, and why shouldn't they, PPP will be: 101.65
Total:10267.28

In my opinion, you are better off just paying down as much as you can, rather than paying $100 !!!!! every month to something that is statistically unlikely to happen to an individual (especially if you compare it with all other reasons why ppl miss they're payments and the fact that more than 50% of us aren't even eligible for the coverage.)